Listen to this blog

TL;DR

Procurement operating models (POMs) are evolving rapidly, with 83% of organizations changing their model in the past five years.
Center-led models strike a balance between centralized strategy and decentralized execution, enabling flexibility and efficiency.
Changing the procurement model itself can drive savings and innovation—even more than the specific model chosen.
Savings potential is consistent across models—decentralized, hybrid, and center-led models yield 6% savings, centralized yields 5%.
Organizations must align their procurement strategy with business goals and adopt flexible, tech-enabled models for long-term impact.

What Are Procurement Operating Models?

A procurement operating model represents the framework that integrates people, processes, and technology to achieve desired outcomes. It defines how an organization delivers procurement value by orchestrating its resources, workflows, and tools in alignment with its strategic goals. Unlike a simple organizational structure, a procurement operating model emphasizes the interconnected roles of human capabilities, process excellence, and technological enablement.

Procurement Operating Models: Strategic Foundation for Savings

Procurement has evolved from a transactional role—once seen as merely “the department that buys stuff”—into a strategic function with board-level impact. In today’s competitive and cost-pressured environment, the procurement operating model a company adopts—centralized, decentralized, or center-led—has a direct bearing on its ability to deliver value.

Leadership is increasingly scrutinizing procurement’s role in cost reduction and efficiency, particularly in a globalized economy where supply chain complexity is the norm. The procurement operating model (POM) plays a pivotal role in defining procurement maturity and strategic value.

The way procurement operates has an impact on the organizational savings and objectives at large. Is your organization following a centralized approach? Or, being decentralized is the way it works? Or, is it in transition phase? What is the impact of the procurement model your organization follows?

A research report by KPMG and Procurement Leaders, “High Impact Procurement Operating Models – A Survey of Global CPOs” tries to identify the linkages between centralized, decentralized, center-led approaches, and savings to find the “best” procurement model.

As per the report, 83% of organizations have changed their Procurement Operating Model (POM) within the last five years. Most companies start from a legacy of decentralized structures, which a nascent procurement function seeks to consolidate in the center. This seems to give way to a second wave of decentralizing, leading to center-led models. As organizations cycle through different POMs, they do not lose the benefits of past models.

Centralized vs. Decentralized vs. Center-Led Procurement Operating Models

Decentralized Procurement Operating Model

Activities are distributed across departments.
Advantages: Flexibility, localized decision-making, strong local supplier relationships.
Disadvantages: Lack of governance, inconsistent standards, reduced spend visibility.

Centralized Procurement Operating Model

All procurement decisions managed by a central team.
Advantages: Spend control, consistent policies, better supplier negotiations.
Disadvantages: Reduced agility, stakeholder friction, slower local responsiveness.

Center-Led Procurement Operating Model

Strategic activities centralized, execution decentralized.
Advantages: Combines governance with responsiveness, ideal for mature organizations.
Disadvantages: Requires strong change management and clear role definitions.

Source: High Impact Procurement Operating Models – A Survey of Global CPOs

Here’s a look at the procurement journey of most of the organizations.

A single operating model does add value to the business. However, changing operating models deliver savings and sustained benefits. The levels of reported savings do not vary greatly between different procurement models. On an average, Decentralized, Center-led and Hybrid models generate a savings of 6%, while Centralized generates 5% savings.

The report says,

“POMs do not by themselves deliver incremental savings. There is no single answer for an organization in finding its procurement operating model. Changing the POM can itself generate additional benefits and possibilities of savings delivered in a new environment. The change, in and of itself, can produce wider benefits.”

With the evolution of the organization, the procurement model evolves. At which stage your organization is in and the operating model it follows will impact the savings and business goals.

How Procurement Operating Models Evolve Over Time

Organizations typically start with decentralized procurement in their early stages. As they grow, they face governance and efficiency challenges that push them toward centralization. Over time, this can lead to a center-led procurement operating model that balances strategic oversight with operational flexibility.

Key drivers of change include regulatory pressures, audit findings, and new leadership aiming for more strategic value. Changing the procurement operating model itself can unlock benefits by resetting procurement’s alignment with enterprise goals.

Evolving with the Right Procurement Operating Model

In today’s dynamic business landscape, no procurement operating model remains optimal forever. From decentralized beginnings to centralized oversight and ultimately to center-led agility, each phase serves a unique purpose in procurement’s maturity journey.

The real value lies in knowing when and how to evolve. A center-led procurement operating model often emerges as the most adaptive, aligning strategy with execution while minimizing friction. By listening to stakeholders, leveraging intelligent technologies like guided buying and generative AI, and maintaining flexibility, procurement can transform from a cost center to a strategic enabler.

Zycus offers an extensive suite of solutions—including Merlin Intake Management, Strategic Sourcing, eProcurement, Contract Management, and Supplier Management—that can support every phase of your procurement operating model evolution. These tools provide AI-powered automation, seamless collaboration, and actionable insights to align procurement functions with strategic business goals.

Ultimately, the right procurement operating model is one that empowers procurement to be responsive, collaborative, and strategically aligned—delivering not only savings but sustained business value.

Related Read:

White Papers

A Smarter Way to Modernize Direct Procurement in Manufacturing

global CPOs, high impact models, operating model, organizational savings, procure-to-pay, procurement objectives, procurement operating model, procurement operation, procurement process, Procurement Solution, procurement strategy, procurement technology

Zycus

Zycus is a leader in Cognititive Procurement. A leading SaaS platform used by many large enterprises across the globe for enabling efficiency and effectiveness of the procurement function.