Intake to Pay vs Procure to Pay: 2025 Guide to Procurement Transformation
In 2025, procurement organizations face increasing pressure to optimize processes amid economic uncertainty. While the Procure-to-Pay (P2P) process is well-established, the Intake-to-Pay (I2P) model is gaining traction for its holistic approach. According to Gartner, procurement leaders see a potential 35% increase in efficiency with I2P systems, highlighting a pivotal shift in strategy.
What is Intake-to-Pay (I2P)?
Intake-to-Pay (I2P) is the end-to-end procurement model encompassing the entire purchase process from request capture to payment. Unlike traditional Procure-to-Pay (P2P), which starts post-contract, I2P integrates every aspect of procurement, ensuring holistic oversight, streamlined processes, and enhanced compliance. It involves capturing purchase requests, automating approvals, managing supplier relationships, and ensuring payment efficiency.
Why Transition to I2P Matters
Organizations using fragmented procurement processes suffer from inefficiencies, compliance risks, and missed opportunities for savings. Financially, these gaps can result in unnecessary spending, higher transaction costs, and lost strategic opportunities. Operational inefficiencies lead to delays, duplicated efforts, and increased error rates, which compromise competitive advantage. Zycus offers solutions to address these challenges through optimized requisition management software.
How Zycus Delivers I2P Transformation
Zycus offers a streamlined transition from P2P to I2P with its Merlin Intake Management solutions, harmonizing procurement functions with seamless integration across all processes. Our solutions capture and consolidate procurement requests, optimize approval workflows, and enhance supplier collaboration, all within a unified platform. Explore the key differences and advantages of adopting I2P in our detailed blog on Inake to Pay vs Procure to Pay.
When to Apply I2P Solutions
I2P becomes crucial in sectors experiencing high transaction volumes, complex approval chains, or regulatory scrutiny, such as healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. Implementing I2P is a strategic priority when aiming to consolidate procurement functions and achieve greater agility and compliance.
FAQs
−
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Proof & Case Study
Case Study: A Fortune 500 manufacturing company struggled with inefficiencies in their procurement process, resulting in delays and compliance issues. By integrating Zycus’s Merlin Intake Management system, the company streamlined its procurement requests and approval processes, improving coordination and compliance, achieving a 30% reduction in transaction processing time and significant improvements in compliance reporting and supplier relationship management.
- Challenge: A Fortune 500 manufacturing company struggled with inefficiencies in their procurement process, resulting in delays and compliance issues.
- Solution: By integrating Zycus’s Merlin Intake Management system, the company streamlined its procurement requests and approval processes, improving coordination and compliance.
- Results: The company achieved a 30% reduction in transaction processing time and saw significant improvements in compliance reporting and supplier relationship management.
Resources
Explore additional materials to help you implement and optimize your procurement processes.
Requisition Management Software
Efficiently capture and manage procurement requests with Zycus’s solutions.
Intake to Pay vs. Procure to Pay: Key Differences and Selecting the Right Approach
Understand the critical differences and benefits of I2P over P2P in this detailed guide.
Merlin Intake for BFSI
Discover how Zycus’s solutions cater to the BFSI sector to streamline procurement.
Ready to transform your procurement process?
See how Zycus’ solutions can redefine your procurement and financial operations.
// Simple FAQ toggle functionality document.querySelectorAll('.faq-question').forEach(question => { question.addEventListener('click', () => { const symbol = question.querySelector('span:last-child'); const answer = question.nextElementSibling; const isOpen = answer.classList.contains('active');
if (isOpen) { symbol.textContent = '+'; answer.classList.remove('active'); } else { symbol.textContent = '−'; answer.classList.add('active'); } }); });
// Smooth scrolling for navigation links
document.querySelectorAll('a[href^="#"]').forEach(anchor => {
anchor.addEventListener('click', function (e) {
e.preventDefault();
const target = document.querySelector(this.getAttribute('href'));
if (target) {
target.scrollIntoView({
behavior: 'smooth',
block: 'start'
});
}
});
});