Zycus Source-to-Pay

Sales Enquiries

Procure-to-Pay technology landscape – A leaf out of the Pulse of Procurement Research 2015

Table of Contents

Procurement process automation has constantly evolved over the years, with significant investments seen in the area of business intelligence, sourcing effectiveness & decision support systems. As a consequence, the 2015 Pulse of Procurement study (report encompasses inputs from more than 400 procurement executives and professionals across the globe) finds significant proportions of companies — some 24% – 42% — planning upgrades across all major solution sets studied.

640x350A large proportion of procurement organizations are still seen using semi-manual/homegrown solutions, either custom-built by internal IT personnel or by procurement pros themselves. While this group is a large source of technology upgrade plans, there is also plenty of upgrade activity planned among companies that have already invested at least one time in either procurement-focused ERP modules or procurement point/suite solutions. In this post we will focus on the findings from Procure-to-Pay perspective. Some of the key findings from the report are;

• Prevalence of Procure-to-Pay (P2P) solutions has jumped 11-pts from year ago, with 64% now reporting solutions in place.

• Investment in P2P is divided roughly between ERP modules (46%) and procurement point or suite solutions (40%), with only 14% going the homegrown route.

Some 29% classify current P2P solutions as inadequate or behind the curve and 31% say upgrade plans are in the works, with the largest group (43%) upgrading from ERP modules.

Only 13% of respondents had rated their current procure-to-pay solution as leading edge. Having a state—of-the-art solution definitely has its own advantages. The impact of state of the art solutions was visible on the key metrics of spend under management, contract compliance, user adoption & last but not the least – cost savings. Procurement organizations classifying their P2P solutions as state of the art report –

Overall tech adoption rates of 18-pts higher than those classifying as behind the curve (55% Vs 37%)

A 10-pt gain in average spend under management compared to those classifying as behind the curve (58% Vs 48%)

Contract Compliance rates 17-points higher than those classifying as behind the curve (70% Vs 53%)

A 3–pt increase in cost savings higher than those classifying as behind the curve (14% Vs 11%). This mere 3 point increase could translate into $15 million savings on a spend of $500 million

While the study was not designed to prove causality, the visible trend of higher performance as a direct impact of investing in state-of-the-art solution would be difficult to ignore.

Build a Sustainable Procurement Landscape in 2023


Transform Your Procurement with Automation and Innovation